What does it all mean for the average library user? Today’s library patrons are used to accessing
much more information over the internet and consequently they’re seeking more
from the library. Frequently,
library catalogues are being accessed off-site. Providing the user with this additional information may assist
with the evaluation of materials and help to narrow their selections before
ever visiting the library. Even
something as simple as providing an image of an album cover of an audio
recording can be extremely helpful, not to mention a little more visually
appealing.
How does this apply to maps? Perhaps snippets of maps can be added to the record to help
illustrate the content of the map. In many cases, the legend of the map can be
included to enrich the catalogue record.
The legend defines all of the symbols shown on the map and
would certainly assist the reader by showing them precisely what it contains. Currently, the scale
and geographic extent of the map forms an integral part of the catalogue
record, but beyond that the record describing the contents can be pretty
sparse. If given an opportunity to
include a portion of the legend, the record will provide a better indication of
what the map actually contains. In
addition to adding the legend, many systems allow individual users to add tags or
to write reviews for the record, further assisting others with their own
evaluation of the resource.
Catalogue records for maps can be pretty vague, but they certainly don’t
need to be!
Interesting how, in the end, libraries tend to focus on improving metadata; it's why we're the best in the world in it! I like your approach of determining what's importing by asking why the user needs to make decisions; very sensible approach
ReplyDeleteI never really thought about content enrichment would apply to maps before - very interesting point. Most people, myself included, would just look at books or periodicals, when in fact this is a useful service for so many other resources as well!
ReplyDelete